INSTITUTE OF SUSTAINABLE PROJECT PLANNING, MONITORING AND EVALAUTION

LECTURER-TO-LECTURER EVALUATION

Name of lecturer rated:  	                                Date __________________

Evaluator: ____________________________    Course title: ___________________________

Rating Scale:                                                          Poor – 1; Fair - 2; Good- 3; Excellent- 4;

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS

1. Pleasant clear, audible voice modulated paced voice			 4     3     2     1

2. Appearance									 1     2    3     4    

3. Poise composure    								 4     3     2     1

4. Friendly and enthusiastic 							 1     2     3     4     

COURSE DESIGN

5. Aims and objectives clear and adequate					 4     3     2     1

6. Content –adequate, appropriate to students.				  1     2     3     4     

7. Strategies suggested – relevant, manageable.				  4     3     2     1

8. Activities, assessment procedures spelt out clearly	. 		  1     2     3     4     

11 Related students to previous experience or knowledge			 4     3     2      1

INTRODUCTION OF LECTURE

9. Stimulating, creative, obtained attending behaviour. 			  1     2     3     4     

10. Objectives clearly stated and relevance explained.			  4     3     2     1

11 Related students to previous experience or knowledge			 1      2     3     4      

UTILIZATION OF CONTENT

12. Appropriate to objectives and group level				4     3     2     1   		
13.  Sufficient depth to achieve objectives.					1      2     3     4     
14. Up to date accurate, objectivity presented 				4      3     2     1
15. Simply, concisely presented, examples provided were needed		1      2     3     4     
16. Well organized, logical sequence						 4     3     2     1
17. Smooth transition from one idea to another				1      2     3     4     
18. Facilitated concept development						 4     3     2     1
19. Key ideas summarized							1      2     3     4     
20. Evidence of use of research base						4      3     2     1

UTILIZATION OF MEDIA AND MATERIALS

21. Appropriate for objectives and content					1      2      3     4     
22. Manageable								4      3      2     1
23. Appealing motivating							1      2      3     4     
24 Multisensory								 4     3      2     1
25. Instructions, processes clearly given and management of practice	1      2      3     4    

INTERACTION BEHAVIOUR

26. Encourage and reinforced student participation				 4     3      2      1
27. Achieved balance between lecturer-student participation		 1     2      3      4     
28. Accepted and used student ideas						 4     3      2      1
29. Asked various types of questions						 1     2      3      4     
30. Perceptive to student involvement; modified when necessary		 4     3      2      1

EVALUATION
31. Provided evidence of achievement of objectives				1      2      3     4     
32. Appropriate to behaviour expected					 4     3     2      1
33. Exhibited evidence of innovativeness					1      2     3      4     

COMMENTS:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EVALUATOR___________________________________SIGNATURE______________________